Like a lot of "conspiracy" videos, The Dark Side of the Moon gets really interesting at the end. However, you have to wait for the good stuff to come.

This one argues that Stanley Kubrick directed the Moon landings hoax. Enjoy!

Dark Side of the Moon

Part I - http://youtube.com/watch?v=UbegH4HMafQ
Part II - http://youtube.com/watch?v=Gsh6JmaKJBA
Part III - http://youtube.com/watch?v=QOhZ-Pn7lV0
Part IV - http://youtube.com/watch?v=O21Q-qGBLRo
Part V - http://youtube.com/watch?v=SSQ952XZQns

Wed, Mar 12 16:02 2008 - 70.17.201.27 - message #1

this one is so-so, not the most convincing Moon Landings hoax video i've seen.

Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6MvcIs4OcQ

here's more Moon stuff:

Proof of moon hoax! (Funny!)
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=mouUUWpEec0&feature=related

Moon Landing, fake or fact, part I:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related

part II:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpeIs5MFTYU&feature=related

part III:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDL1ugE7Tfw&feature=related

Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves

Mon, Mar 10 21:05 2008 - 70.17.201.27 - message #0

...there's news reports that Earth is desperately in need of helium. Scientists need it but there's not much left here.

meanwhile, there's always been a lot of helium on the Moon:
http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2006/12/72276

so how come we're not sending people to the Moon now, to get some helium? After all, the Human Race sent people to the Moon frequently just thirty years ago.

maybe, just maybe, no one has ever been to the Moon.

Helium Supplies Endangered

Sat, Jan 12 16:33 2008 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-1

here's another interesting page, from a friend of mine.

Moon buggie

Sat, Dec 15 13:30 2007 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-2

give this one five minutes to get warmed up. after that, it gets very interesting.

Was it only a paper Moon?

Fri, Dec 14 20:34 2007 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-3

I find this very interesting, my grandfather died when he was at the close age of 90 and always said we did not land on the moon.

Thu, Jul 26 11:06 2007 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-4

here's more comedy from the BBC. The article is titled "Lunar dust 'may harm astronauts'". The idea is that the astronauts really went to the Moon--and back. They didn't simply stage the Moon landings in the Nevada desert.

in the article they publish a footprint supposedly from an astronaut on the Moon. Unfortunately, the footprint could not have been taken there. There is no moisture on the Moon. There is insufficient moisture to create a footprint.

It is pretty funny watching the corporate media struggle to contain the Moon landings hoax. the public is starting to figure out the truth!
Lunar dust may harm astronauts

Tue, Mar 20 07:39 2007 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-5

To the question, "how could we go to the Moon in the 60's when we can only go a few hundred miles from Earth now?"---we CAN go to the Moon now, we just choose not to because it's POINTLESS, not to mention more expensive than a shuttle mission. We already went to the Moon several times, so why keep doing it? Plus shuttles are not designed for moon travel, they are specifically made to orbit around the Earth and re-enter. The shuttle era marked the end of moon travel, period.

The fact that shuttles have killed more people than the Moon missions means nothing. Distance traveled is not the reason the shuttles exploded. One exploded before it got to space, and the other was in re-entry. Space travel in general is VERY hard to do, whether it's the 60's or 2007. Plus, astronauts did die before the shuttle missions, just not in the Apollo ones, luckily, although Apollo 13 was a close call.

We went to the Moon, people...really, we did.

Fri, Feb 9 18:45 2007 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-6

ABC news has an article out now. headline is "Back to the Moon - Can We Afford it"?

now, the truth is the human race has NOT gone to the Moon. not once. i used to be certain that people who doubted the Moon landings were nuts. then i saw the documentation to the contrary.

ABC news knows that the Moon landings were faked...

ABC: 'Back to the Moon'

Thu, Dec 7 15:08 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-7

here's an interesting commentary from Moonhoax.com . i'm reprinting it here because they have a history of removing good content after it has been published:

* * *

The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth. How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch, NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then returning, without ever killing anyone? How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty degree heat for three days with batteries? Why is the "second round" of "returning" to the moon estimated to be no earlier than half a century after the first? (Would there be a fifty-year span between the first and second trips across the Atlantic in an airplane?)

If the moon landings were, as we believe, a government deception, then George Orwell's comment, "whoever controls the past, controls the future" is a scary wakeup call to insist that our government reform to the truthfulness of our founding father "who could not tell a lie." Otherwise, the powers that be will continue their addiction to deception and we all will be worse off for it.

http://www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/default.asp
Moon landings are science fiction

Sun, Sep 17 20:12 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-8

Yahoo tells us that an Iranian-born business woman is paying $20 million to go into space:
http://www.mbpolitics.com/Yahoo_Space_Tourist_09_16_06.html

what's funny about this is they will probably only go a few thousand miles above Earth's surface for this. meanwhile, in the late-1960s, early-1970s, NASA supposedly went to the Moon many times.

the Moon is 238,000 miles away. That's comparable to 30 times the Earth's equatorial diameter.

how come since the Moon landings they've only managed to go a few thousand miles into space?
Space Tourist

Sun, Sep 17 19:04 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-9

has anyone noticed that NASA has suddenly "lost" a lot of its "moon landings" documentation?
http://www.mbpolitics.com/abc_moon_hoax.html
http://www.mbpolitics.com/Telegraph_Moon_Hoax_08_23_06.html

Sure! it sounds to me like people are finally starting to catch on to the moon hoax. NASA has to dump the documentation because it is all fake.

Wed, Aug 23 16:37 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-10

Well, I just finished watching 'The Dark Side of the Moon' and all I can say is that it's a hoax about a hoax ... but maybe this parody is more accurate and contains more truth than any one will ever know ? ... Sometimes hiding in plain sight is the smartest way to continue a cover up .

Sat, Jun 10 20:39 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-11

I have just spent over the past two years of my life posting on web sites where the majority of the members believe that nasa landed men on the moon during the Apollo missions ...And no matter what evidence I posted proving otherwise ,there was no getting through to the brainwashed pro Apollo clan ... I have been verbally abused and attacked beyond belief on a daily basis on some of these sites , and was even run off of one site recently because of my beliefs about Apollo and for standing up to the site administrator when a witch hunt was started against me ...

How great it is to find a site such as this one, where people are intelligent enough to realize that Apollo was nothing but a fake in every respect ... I am looking forward to reading the articles here and also watching 'The Dark Side of the Moon' video here ... I have the Fox Special "Conspiracy Theory : Did We Land on the Moon'....and also Bart Sibrel's 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon ' documentaries , ... and they both do a fine job of exposing nasa's lies .

Sat, Jun 10 19:11 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-12

someone who knows says "Darkside of the Moon" is only about 10% factual. However, it is definitely worth seeing. Does anyone still believe we landed on the Moon? (we didn't.)

Dark Side of the Moon

Tue, May 23 20:47 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-13

In the photograph below, why are there footprints on the Moon? There's no moisture on the Moon to create them. Why is the flag blowing in the wind? There's no wind on the Moon. Why are there no stars?

Folks, ALL of the documentation about Moon landings is fake. The human race has never landed on the Moon.
Moonquakes surprisingly common

Mon, Mar 27 08:37 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-14

What NASA (i.e., HOAX-A) isn't telling us about Mars, part I:
http://www.rense.com/general68/nasaisnt.htm

Part II:
http://www.rense.com/general69/tt.htm

Part III:
http://www.rense.com/general69/newmar.htm

Lots of fun!

How much is NASA lying to us?
What NASA isn't telling us about Mars

Sat, Mar 4 14:29 2006 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-15

check out this ridiculous photograph supposedly of Apollo 17 on the Moon! Let's see:

1. the flag is waving. this is impossible on the Moon.

2. footprints from the astronaut. Impossible without moisture.

3. multiple light sources; i.e., the astronaut is lit from behind. Yet, we can see fine details on the front of his suit which should be in shadow.

Folks, we were lied to. there has never been a moon landing!
Apollo 17 - what a joke

Sun, Dec 18 10:06 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-16

here's another cool movie debunking the moon landings. It takes about 20 minutes to get interesting, so don't give up on it if it starts out slow.

this movie gets really interesting about 3/4 into it. Check it out!
Dark Side of the Moon

Mon, Dec 5 21:59 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-17

it sure is funny how all of a sudden "Moon Walker" Armstrong wants to "submit" to a "biography".

Maybe he'll explain why the flags were waving on the moon? How about the deadly radiation belts? How about...


"Moon walker Armstrong submits to biography

Mon, Dec 5 16:17 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-18

"The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth. How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch, NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then returning, without ever killing anyone? How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty degree heat for three days with batteries? Why is the "second round" of "returning" to the moon estimated to be no earlier than half a century after the first? (Would there be a fifty-year span between the first and second trips across the Atlantic in an airplane..."

hehe. The Moon landings are science fiction

Tue, Nov 29 09:22 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-19

A video, narrated by a beautiful woman, that disputes the moon landings theory. Recommended.
great moon hoax video!

Sat, Nov 12 19:59 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-20

here's a great site that discusses some of the many anomalies with the Apollo moon landings. The shadows are wrong, the flag flaps in the wind, the gravity is wrong.

Folks, the moon landings were a hoax!
Faked Apollo Landings

Mon, Jan 24 14:02 2005 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-21

i've recently screened a video that appeared on Fox TV called "Did we really land on the moon?" Excellent program. I'm now convinced that we did not.

Wed, Dec 1 12:54 2004 - 70.17.201.27 - message #-22